There are some key aspects throughout Battlefield 's history that have contributed to the franchise becoming a bit mediocre. Defining features like destruction are no longer emphasized in a functional manner, while single-player is consistently forced into the experience, despite often being an afterthought for players who love Battlefield 's signature multiplayer. Battlefield is having an identity crisis, one that's not easily solved. Battlefield needs to hone in on what made the series so special in the first place and emphasize t

Battlefield 5 's reveal and lead up to release genuinely had a lot of hype surrounding the game, despite igniting an equal amount of controversy over its depiction of World War II . DICE's development team was rolling out an ambitious update schedule based around real-life events from 1940-1945. Each expansion would emphasize several milestone events that occurred chronologically throughout the war. Conceptually, it was a radical and positively received idea, one that'd be worth revisiting, but the main issue with Battlefield 5 was mounting stability issues and competition getting in the way of the game's ambit

That being said, returning the Battlefield series to a modern setting doesn't come without its challenges. Specifically because of the other franchises mentioned above, Call of Duty . Not only would over-saturation of modern shooters be a problem, but the Call of Duty franchise has encroached closer to what used to make Battlefield distinctly different from it. With game modes like Ground War and the Warzone battle royale, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare has also tackled big team battle modes to fans' praise. Ground War in a lot of ways emulates Battlefield 's Conquest mode , and has been pretty widely enjoyed by fans as w

Perhaps the worst thing now is Battlefield is dealing with an identity crisis. Being the gritty simulatory modern combat experience Battlefield is known for just isn't enough. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare does that, but also backs that with the characters like Captain Price who make the experience more memorable. Not only that, but Modern Warfare 's version of Ground War essentially became a version of Conquest from battlefield 2042 updates|https://battlefield2042hq.com/ , minus the destruction. A lot of what made Battlefield special, Call of Duty is now doing even bett

With Battlefield 5 wrapping up its content roadmap this year, DICE and EA are looking to the future. Battlefield 5 was the subject to a lot of controversy, some of it unwarranted, but plenty of it absolutely justified. As a result, the ambitious roadmap of content updates slowed to a halt and players abandoned the game. Now the Battlefield franchise has its full focus on the next entry, set to release for PS5 and Xbox Series X in the 2022 fiscal y

For the better part of thelast decade, the Battlefieldseries was the popular placeto go for large-scale online multiplayer in the FPS space, offering players the opportunity to shoot it out on large maps in 64-player matches. That number’s almost quaint nowadays in the age of battle royale shooters that can support up to 200 players per match , but if the latest from the rumor mill is to be believed, it’s going to be bumped up considerably for the upcoming Battlefield

Simply put, previous Battlefield games have seen success in a modern setting before so it makes sense to return there. Some of the most popular games in the franchise like Bad Company 1/2 and Battlefield 3/4 each saw great commercial and critical success depicting modern warfare. Battlefield is in a peculiar position it's honestly never really been in before, where the series got its start simulating battles of WWII but has now seen one of its worst-performing games based in WWII . Jumping back to a modern time period, as ironic as it may be, could be exactly what the franchise needs for a comeb

Classes in Battlefield fit specific archetypes , designed to emphasize specific roles for players rather than allowing total class freedom. Engineers could sabotage and destroy enemy armor, medics support the rest of the squad, Recon are for the sniper-inclined, and Assault is the standard-fare class, each serving distinct roles in all skirmishes. Battlefield has always had the bones for emphasizing proper team composition, but it's never been very important for the success rate of matc

Of course, this brings into question what time period Battlefield 6 could take place in. It's very possible the series could return to contemporary warfare, similar to many entries before. Or the franchise could pull another Battlefield 1 and pick a time of war that games have rarely portrayed. There's a few options for Battlefield 6 in terms of a time period or setting, ranging from the most likely to most improba

Rival franchise Call of Duty also did something similar, and has seen phenomenal success with its Modern Warfare reboot. It's not a one-to-one comparison by any means, but it should at least be encouraging for the Battlefield series. The Call of Duty series also put out a WWII shooter in 2017 that, while not exactly as unpopular as Battlefield 5 has become for fans, also had a particularly middling release even for a Call of Duty title. There were a few problems with microtransactions (a prevalent issue back in 2017 for several games) , the weapon and perk variety in multiplayer, and story gripes as well. Then Call of Duty went back to basics with Modern Warfare , and so far has seen great success, not even counting Warzo